Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Faster Test Reported For Detecting Fake Tamiflu In Fight Against Counterfeit Drugs

Friday, November 14, 2008, 8:19
This news item was posted in Health & Medicine category and has 1 Comment so far.

In a report scheduled for presentation at the 235th national meeting of the American Chemical Society, Facundo M. Fernandez, Ph.D., and colleagues describe use of a method called Desorption Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry (DESI-MS) that can determine authenticity of large batches of Tamiflu samples up to 20 times faster than conventional methods.

"It’s a one-step process that doesn’t require any extensive sample preparation," said Fernandez, of the Georgia Institute of Technology. Using DESI-MS, analysis of the Tamiflu powder yields results in less than one minute. The "gold standard" for gauging pharmaceutical quality control is a powerful but much slower method called high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), he said. Analysis by HPLC could take up to an hour.

The researchers describe their study as the first successful demonstration of DESI-MS’s use for Tamiflu screening. "This method is really targeted at screening large amounts of products" that might be expected during a pandemic of influenza, Fernandez said. "In case of a crisis, you wouldn’t be able to wait an hour per sample. You’d want to screen hundreds of samples per day."

When fears of a pandemic, a global epidemic, of avian influenza first emerged, worried consumers in the United States and other countries began to horde Tamiflu in 2005, seeking prescriptions from physicians and purchasing the medication from online pharmacies. In 2007, there were 86 confirmed human cases of bird flu in the world, according to the World Health Organization. The fatality rate was high, with 59 deaths.

Fernandez tested DESI-MS’s effectiveness by collecting different Tamiflu samples from online pharmacies and found all of them to contain the active ingredient. Customers who purchase from online pharmacies, he warns, should use extra caution when shopping. Although some online pharmacies are certified, he says people usually look for low prices instead. "What you get online can be pretty much anything," he said. "It’s very easy for the counterfeiter to bypass the system that’s in place to protect the consumer. And it’s very easy for the consumer to get medications."

At $6.50 per pill, Tamiflu’s high cost and demand have made it a preferred target for fakes, Fernandez noted. Counterfeits have already surfaced in Chicago, San Francisco and other areas.

International trade in counterfeits is a lucrative enterprise — and an increasingly sophisticated one, Fernandez said. According to the International Chamber of Commerce, global trade in counterfeit goods costs the U.S. economy between $200 billion and $250 billion a year in lost sales and is responsible for the loss of more than 750,000 American jobs. "The penalties for counterfeiting pharmaceuticals are much lower than for trafficking illegal drugs like cocaine," Fernandez said. "Many of the operations focused on making illegal drugs are shifting to counterfeiting drugs because of the low penalties and high profits."

A few initiatives have surfaced to fight the presence of fakes, including ones by the U. S. Food and Drug Administration and the WHO, among others. Global awareness has increased, Fernandez said, but it’s not enough. "What’s the percentage of fake drugs in the marketplace? I don’t know. I don’t think anybody can give you a real number. That’s really a huge problem."

Fernandez remains optimistic about solving the problem of fake Tamiflu, however. "I think it’s possible to shut down this traffic, but it will require new tools and new approaches," he said. "We need to get very creative because the incentive for making fake drugs is huge. We always feel like we’re trying to catch up with the counterfeiters. Every time we get a new batch of fakes, they’re more sophisticated than the previous batch."

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Faster Test Reported For Detecting Fake Tamiflu In Fight Against Counterfeit Drugs”

  1. Paul Fowler said on Wednesday, November 19, 2008, 9:49

    The verification technique described in the article is a valuable addition to fighting counterfeiting of Tamiflu, but I question the practicality of “testing” counterfeits out of the pharmaceutical supply chain. The CDC’s Countermeasure Response team has over twenty drugs on their public health watch tracking list, including Tamiflu, and more are added each year. Protecting the public safety involves assuring all these drugs are genuine and available for a rapid response to a health threat.

    A majority of the anti-counterfeiting initiatives sponsored by the U. S. Food and Drug Administration and the WHO focus on product serializing and tracking and tracing of product through the supply chain. This method has significant advantages over spot verification.

    In brief, track and trace is the process of placing a standard EPC (electronic product code) serial number on a product and storing that number in an EPCIS repository so that individuals down the supply chain can verify that the product was controlled securely throughout the supply chain and is genuine.

    The CDC’s recent efforts have been to monitor the inventory and usage of these drugs in order to identify potential events and proactively drive responses. (For more information, visit their Web site.)

    By using the track and trace method, all of the products on the countermeasures list would be protected, and the event information generated by such a system would be used to provide critical inventory, product movement, and usage information. It’s really a win-win by eliminating counterfeits and providing critical information that enables government officials to rapidly respond to public hazards.

    This is a battle we need to fight on all fronts.

    Paul Fowler
    VP, Healthcare Innovation, Office of the CTO
    Axway Inc.

Leave a Reply